Edging Ahead…

Essential Question: Whose responsibility is it to teach students to be safe online?

It’s Everyone’s Responsibility (everyone with any connection to “21st Century Kids”, that is).

• Everyone
• Everyone teaching
• Everyone teaching kids
• Everyone teaching kids online
• Everyone teaching kids online safety
• Everyone teaching kids online
• Everyone teaching kids
• Everyone teaching
• Everyone…

(image: a “Duck and Cover” poster reproduced in Wikipedia)

Why everyone?

• Because issues of identity, security and safety touches every individual in the interconnected world that web2.0 has introduced – and we don’t come with a built-in protective shell…
• Because it’s never too early to begin teaching kids about the world they are stepping into. My 22-month old son regularly astonishes me with the depth of his understanding. Although he’s just developing the verbal language to engage in logical discourse, he intuitively recognizes good and bad behaviors and safe vs. unsafe practices. Since he’s not at school yet, it’s my job, and the job of all his caregivers, to help him develop this mindset of behaving safely in the tactile world he still inhabits, and so to prepare him to behave safely online.
• Because personal Safety, in any environment, must become a “habit of mind”, and so we should turn to any and all resources available to promote this habit.
• Because we can’t rely on “the powers that be” to do the right thing when faced with a question of the magnitude that this represents.

In a neat cycle of positive reinforcement, the web itself is a wonderful resource for tools, strategies and resources to help kids develop this overarching culture of personal safety. Some interesting and useful personal safety resources include;

• Power of Parents. A Child Safety and Awareness Program – an age-graded and personnel-specific handbook to strategies for keeping kids safe up to the point where they might be developing an online presence. Sponsored by Duracell and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
• Mecklenburg County Public School Internet Safety Curriculum for K-12.  There are likely many of these available. I’ve chosen this one simply because it’s neatly laid out in the traditional “Scope and Sequence” style that I still find easy to follow.
• iSafe K-12 Curriculum Scope 06-07 - a commercial product by i-SAFE Inc. a self-proclaimed “worldwide leader in Internet safety education. Founded in 1998 and endorsed by the U.S. Congress, i-SAFE is a non-profit foundation dedicated to protecting the online experiences of youth everywhere.”

I’m reminded, though,  that I grew up in the 1950’s, when “Duck & Cover” was the official advice from the US government to address the nuclear threat we were reminded of with every 6 pm Wednesday Emergency Alert siren test.  The “Duck and Cover” strategy was not just woefully inadequate. It was ludicrous. Even at 10, I recognized the futility of hiding my head in the sand if the big one went off where I could see it.

I wonder if exhortations to kids to protect themselves online don’t have some of the same theatre-of-the-absurd elements to them. Is there a value in promoting specific strategies to help protect one from dangers past? What about the frightening potentialities of the future? How can we let kids online at all and still protect them against the constantly evolving web of virtual entanglement?

The web, however, is a fact of life for kids in the here and now. Ignoring the already identified risks in online activity is a sure recipe for personal and societal disaster, and there are already enough coming-apocalypse scenarios to go around. And so, it seems, it’s up to Everyone, to follow the Middle Way regarding online safety for the next generation of virtual explorers.

(the 8-fold Path or Middle Way: Show Understanding in Thought, Speech and Action through Right Livelihood, Effort, Mindfulness, and Concentration)…

Reuben James Runquist, the octagenarian protagonist of my own Post-Apocalyptic “Road-book” proposes a mnemonic to keep himself on the Buddhist “Eight-fold Path” in the post-apocalyptic world he inhabits.

“Live Every Moment Carefully”

…advice as relevant in the virtual world as at the dawn of Buddhist thought…

Are we preparing students for a world of Mass Collaboration? Not very effectively, if we are talking about Mass Collaboration using emerging Web2.0 tools. Until recently, we actively discouraged kids from using even Wikipedia – arguably the first and most developed example of “Mass Collaboration” on the planet (satement made in class on April 23rd).  Arguably, because;

• Wikipedia has published statistics indicating that in October 2007 they maxed out at 175,000 contributors who have edited (in English) at least 10 times since joining.
• In March 2009, Second Life reports that the number of Residents with repeat logins users hit 732,526.
  
• In April 2008, statistics published in http://www.mmogchart.com/ showed World of WarCraft topping the MMORPG charts at 10,000,000 users, 5.5 Million of which are in Asia.

Are we preparing students for a world of Mass Collaboration? Not very effectively. We still generally;

• require written (and usualy harccopy) assignments as indicators of learning or understanding. More often than not, these assignments are assigned to and assessed by, individuals (the student expected to develop the assignment on his/her own, and the teacher “marking” it personally).
• dismiss alternative media or assessment tasks as being unmanageable or “unassessable”.
• discourage  (or prohibit) kids from playing MMORPG’s in school and virtually never enlist them in the service of learning or assessment
• read about (and perhaps tinker with individually) virtual worlds like Second Life,  but have no official presence there.
• offer kids “penpal-type” experiences with students in remote areas using the new tools, occasionally Skype in a speaker from another part of the world, and sometimes set up “global classroom” projects involving a handful of classes geographically remote from each other,  but in reality, these projects still account for single-digit percentage of the average student’s day

Do we get kids involved in truly “Mass Collaboration” activities? Not very often, if ever, at this writing? How many of our kids have edited a Wikipedia article under our guidance? How many are members of Teen Second Life with school sponsorship or support? How many are MMORPG gamers with school acknowledgement? (I sponsor a “Game” division of my library club, which has a dozen active members in a school population of 700)

How do we prepare students for a world of Mass Collaboration? Perhaps the question should be “How would we prepare students for a world of Mass Collaboration (if we were truly doing so)?”

How would we prepare students for such a world? We would;

• Rewrite Acceptable Use Policies and “device use policies” to acknowledge a vastly enhanced range of acceptable activity with both bandwith and with access devices.
• Encourage student to share with teachers their online experiences and expertises rather than to hide them because they are “against the rules”.
• Recognize and mentor student Pathfinders who would search out, pilot and evaluate emerging technologies for accessing, managing and sharing insights and for creating new learning. This would logically and functionally enhance our commitment to helping students;
  • Reach their academic, recognizable potential
  • Become experts in understanding and guiding their own learning
  • Acquire an international education that inspires understanding and enthusiasmfor world citizenship and service to others:
• Massively increase our bandwidth so that we could support whatever (appropriate) online activities kids might like to engage in. This would include;
  • Online Gaming, both of the strategy-based MMORGS, but also traditional games like Chess. Chess ladders are common on the web, and players could join ongoing tournaments at their level of expertise and learn from both experts and simply from an exponentially larger pool of players than is available in their “real” world, whereever it might be
  • a presence in Teen Second Life where our students could collaborate both literally with their classmates and virtually with global visitors
  • Exploration of other Virtual Worlds like “Teen Second Life”. Virtual worlds can eliminate national and cultural barriers, remove physical limitations (everybody can fly in Second Life) and level the playing fied regarding age, sex or experience.

How could we improve how we prepare students for Mass Collaboration?

We need to embrace the wave of change and evolution in the same way our kids do – and embrace our kids as the agents of that change as well as the beneficiaries of it.

Then Again – maybe it’s a moot point, 2012 upcoming an’ all:)…

Essential Question: “What makes the web so powerful?” The one-word answer? Quality.

I’ll get to why this it. But first – In view of the “digital reality” of (our) students today, I’ve been seriously considering retiring one of the “soapbox speeches” I sometimes trot out when talking with a class that has that particular glazed-look attitude to actually looking in a book for information on their current assignment

“HEY! Check this out!” I tell them, once I’ve got their attention by jumping up on a chair, a table, or whatever is available that can give me a bit of a vantage (I’m only 5′8″ and shrinking…) and using my traveling evangelist voice.

“There’s a new technology you should know about for this assignment It’s the most amazing device ever invented for gathering, storing and providing quick answers to just about any question you might have. It’s compact, reasonably lightweight, instantly accessible, and infinitely retrievable. The information is logically organized in a way that’s easy to follow and convenient to reproduce for your own use. Setup is a snap, and there’s no tangle of cables and plugs drive you buggy. Best of all, it doesn’t even need electricity. Just grab it and GO!

I hold up a book, usually one measuring more than the 1 cm thick that I’ve noted as the limit of most teens’ interest (”if the answers aren’t in 64 pages, I’ll just Google it…”)

“This is it,” I tell them. It’s called a BOOK. And it’s a timeless example of “QUALITY“...

***

I spent the Songkran vacation upcountry (well, it’s looks like “downcountry” on a map, but it’s distinctly UPCountry).  This trip I decided to just go Cold Turkey. I packed a briefcase, the backpack I usually haul all my laptops bits around in, and, for good measure, the conference bag picked up at Learning 2.0 – with printed BOOKS, and every day I treated myself to a couple new titles.

It’s been a while since I spent any amount of real quality time reading for pleasure, and so many of the titles I had on this trip were fiction, and there area some great reads here. Check out my thoughts on these at “Reading for the Future“. Heading into this break, I figured I also would have some time on my hands (like during the 13 1/2 hour drive down) when I wouldn’t be able to read, but I could listen, so I downloaded several new titles to my phone (I don’t have an iphone, so need to list on my O2). I recently listened to “One Second After” and decided I wanted something along that line, so I had 12 hours of ”Apocalypse 2012″ by Lawrence E. Joseph to chew over. Joseph’s take on the many and varied ways in which events seem to be converging toward an inevitable collapse of society (and the technologies that underpin it) as we have come to expect them, is, in my view, a “must-read” for anyone in education, in the tech world, or just in the business of “getting on with life”.  While a true “apocalypse” may be not be inevitable, I believe that a rethink of our expectations for the future IS – and enduring quality figures prominently in whatever that future holds.

Because both “One Second After” and “Apocalypes 2012″ are pretty dark visions of the future, and to provide a bit of timeless food for thought, I also decided on this trip to try out one of our new MP3 CD audiobooks. This gave me another 9 hours of “Zen and Now” a recently published followup to the classic “Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance”. For anyone who has ever read and mulled over Robert Pirsig’s reflections on “Quality“, n “Zen and Now”, Mark Richardson offers up his own road-trip along with unique insights into Pirsig’s philosophy, and details of the Pirsig’s personal journey that, as a rider myself (with several motorcycling incidents detailed in my own book), I found absolutlely riveting. A “must-read” (or listen. Actually, this is one of those titles that I find huge pleasure in going back to again and again to listen while the miles spool by). Don’t miss it!

Of course, I didn’t ignore the non-fiction side either. To start out, I reviewed, skimmed, or otherwise perused a collection of new titles recently arrived for our library on environment/climate topics. All of these, now available in our Main Library, are worth checking out. If you aren’t yet convinced of the gravity of the situation facing the world today, or if you’re convinced, but uncertain of how you, as a single individual, can be “part of the solution rather than part of the problem”, check these out;

• Climate Chaos. Your Health at Risk. Cindy L. Parker & Stephen Shapiro. Praeger, 2008
Energy Supply and Renewable Resources. Regina Anne Kelly. Checkmark Books, 2008
• Going Global. Key Quest for the 21s Century. Michael Moynagh & Richard Worsley. A&C Black, 2008.
• Harnessing the Sun’s Energy. Why Science Matters. Heinemann, 2009.
• Plan C. Community Survival Strategies for Peak Oil and Climate Change. Pat Murphy. New Society Publishers, 2008
• Seven Years to Save the Planet. Questions and Answers.  Bill McGuire. Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 2008

Better yet, I brought with me the print copy of “Born Digital. Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives“, by John Palfrey and Urs Gasser (Basic Books, 2008).

I picked it up and glanced at the introduction, intending to skim it and summarize what I figured I already had a pretty good handle on. But then I found myself actually reading it fully, nodding at the examples that struck a chord, reflecting on the discussions we’ve already had on topics covered, and turning over in my head the things we haven’t discussed yet. I found myself going back to chapters that seemed particularly relevant and mulling over the salient points. The chapter on Quality was particularly of interest in view of my concurrent listening to “Zen and Now” and thinking back to Robert Pirsig’s theses on quality from 40 years ago. I even bookmarked several of the key points, and the book is beginning to develop a thumbed-through look even though I’m the first reader. If you’re one of the shrinking number of people who still love to read real books, get the book and spend some quality time with it.  For starters, chew on this (I’ve blogged about this on several occasions)

• p. 14 par.3 ”One of the most worrying things about all digital culture is the huge divide it’s opening up between the havs and have nots.”, and
• p. 14 par.4 “The vast majority of young people born in the world today are not growing up as Digital Natives.”

And don’t stint on Chapter 7. In the digital age, these points are more relevant than ever.  

• p. 161 – “Information quality goes directly to the heart of what it means to have a freer society. Unfortunately not all Digital Natives see it this way… In conversations with Digital Natives about information quality, questions like “So what?” and “Who Cares” are common refrains.”
• p. 163 – “It’s essential that all of us be able to differentiate good information from bad. By virtue of their age and education level Digital Natives are more susceptible  than adults to the threats posed by inaccurate information.”
• p. 165 – “When speaking about information quality, we always need to ask: “Quality” viewed from what perspective and in what context?”
• p. 166 – “…young people who access the Web, for instance, through computers in the library need to get the information very quickly and thus don’t have the time to evaluate their sources carefully.”
• p. 167 – “The ability to make quality judgements about information on the internet is not an innate skill.”

There’s more, much more. Get the hard copy and do yourself a favor. Spend some Quality time with “Born Digital” and in particular, with Chapter 7.

Back to the shop, to reality, tomorrow. I’ll be continuing to think, though, about quality – and I’m thinking that Robert Pirsig, Mark Richardson, and others, who worked, and still exist, almost exclusively in the world of print, may really have the answers (and the questions) that those “Born Digital” may never experience.

Perhaps, in the end, I consider myself lucky to be a “Digital Settler” (”Born Digital, p. 3). I like this designation better than the more commonly used “Digital Immigrant”. I’ve been there from the beginning. I worked on my first Commodore Vic20 program  (4 K of memory delivered straight to a tv monitor) for a travelling set of the new devices in Abbotsford School District in BC, Canada, in 1980. I have a collection of personal computers including one of those Vic20s, a Commodore PET, a Radio Shack TRS80, and each of the Macintosh models from the original Mac128 to the last of the all-in-one models (the Color Classic, in 1995). I appreciate quality – and I’ll keep striving for it as I move into the future – whatever it holds.

Essential Question of the Week: Do we as a global society need to rethink copyright laws? What’s our role as educators in copyright usage in schools?

I’m a strong proponent of modernizing copyright laws to reflect changes in both technology AND in society, As part of this course, I added a Creative Commons Atttibution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License to this blog. I’m on track to become a truly 21st century “cyber-citizen”.

I still worry, however, about simply bowing to the inevitable: the inevitable, in this case, is the perhaps inescapable conclusion that technology is making digital “mashups” of content from a growing number of technically accessible sources the norm in the “cyber” world.

Should we just assign a Creative Commons license to everything out there and be done with it? Encourage our students to troll the web, grab a selection of keyword-linked bits, paste them up in an approximation of original thought (providing  web-link attribution where it’s obviously not our own material) and throw in a few pithy aphorisms to give the piece the illusion of depth? It’s the way of the future, it seems.

But then a piece; a well-researched, documented and carefully crafted written piece, comes across my desk that forces me to re-think my complacency at accepting yet another small chipping away of traditional standards of scholarly research and creative expression. Make no mistake; I believe that the current penchant for posting every whimsy and personal conceit to the cyber-world at large is morphing the global pool of informative thought and creative expression into a quagmire of personal opinion superfluity.

The piece that got me thinking along this line was was an article in the March 20, 2009 issue of the Chronicle of Higher Education. forwarded to me by Dr. Jeff Harper, a thoughtful and broadly-read HS Counselor at our school, the article reminds me to consider the possible logical conclusions if we continue down the path which has brought us;

The Globalization of Cheating

Image reproduced from “Cheating Goes Global as Essay Mills Multiply” The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 20, 2009

Do we, as a global society, need to rethink copyright laws?” Of course. With the exponential growth of data and knowledge, we need to find new ways of exploiting and sharing original thought, recombining disparate ideas, and creating original new theses to explain our world. These kinds of creative endeavors should not be hamstrung by archaic systems of citation or attribution.

What’s our role as educators in copyright usage in schools?

• To move past the “letter of the law” approach focusing on a minimalist “what we can get away with” attitude,  or “the world’s your oyster” approach promoting the tired rehashing of an ever-decreasing pool of original thought.
• To re-introduce a regard for intellectual property that seems to be slipping away, emphasizing, from our efforts at introducing students to scholarly research, the ethical consideration of using other people’s work in the service of our own.
• To consider the “logical conclusion” of promoting uncritical, smorgasbord-based information selection and regurgitation instead of meaningful data harvesting and thoughtful digestion leading to the synthesis of real new ideas.

I don’t believe that it’s possible to overstate the seriousness of this situation. We ignore the “globalization of cheating” at our, and our future decision-makers’, peril; perhaps at the peril of the very societies that have brought about this Information “Garden of Eden”.

How can I make such a broad, sweeping statement? I base this on Jared Diamond’s fifth core reason for societal collapse, which is “the political cultural, and social factors in a society which make it more or less likely that a society will succeed…”

I believe that our inability to retain certain core societal values truly does threaten our very future. Who will generate new Eureka experiences if we teach the next generation to just “borrow” without building on original ideas?  Will the breadth and depth of “scholarly” thought wither from the inevitable decline of original thought when everyone is continually rehashing the thoughts of a few renegade thinkers? Will our society truly Fail, as proposed by Jared Diamond, because, among other things, we do not address root social problems that threaten to destablilize that society – like the “globalization of cheating”.

All of Diamond’s arguments are compelling – and truly frightening for the future. Worth 18 minutes of your time if you haven’t read the book…

TED Talk “Why Societies Collapse”  http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/jared_diamond_on_why_societies_collapse.html

‘,width:’100′,height:’100′” width=”100″ height=”100″ align=”" />

object>