<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Course Reflection &#8211; Living out the Soapbox Speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edgingahead.edublogs.org/2009/04/18/course-reflection-living-out-the-soapbox-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edgingahead.edublogs.org/2009/04/18/course-reflection-living-out-the-soapbox-speech/</link>
	<description>One Teacher-Librarian's Journey from Print to Web...to Web2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:11:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rubisr</title>
		<link>http://edgingahead.edublogs.org/2009/04/18/course-reflection-living-out-the-soapbox-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>rubisr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edgingahead.edublogs.org/?p=113#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Doug,
An excellent point about the inherent need to evaluate everything one &quot;absorbs&quot; - regardless of format. Certainly I&#039;ve read some real turkeys in my time. Can&#039;t help wondering how THEY got published and yet I can&#039;t crack that nut with my own efforts...

Mulling over this post yesterday after I posted (guess I should have mulled and then posted, mmmm), it occurred to me that I never really got around to my point about how &quot;quality&quot; makes the web powerful. Without going off on another tangent, I guess, it&#039;s because in spite of my predilection for print, I recognize that the web&#039;s very size and scope makes it almost inevitable that much of what&#039;s so readily available there is far more focused and enlightening than can be easily found in print.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug,<br />
An excellent point about the inherent need to evaluate everything one &#8220;absorbs&#8221; &#8211; regardless of format. Certainly I&#8217;ve read some real turkeys in my time. Can&#8217;t help wondering how THEY got published and yet I can&#8217;t crack that nut with my own efforts&#8230;</p>
<p>Mulling over this post yesterday after I posted (guess I should have mulled and then posted, mmmm), it occurred to me that I never really got around to my point about how &#8220;quality&#8221; makes the web powerful. Without going off on another tangent, I guess, it&#8217;s because in spite of my predilection for print, I recognize that the web&#8217;s very size and scope makes it almost inevitable that much of what&#8217;s so readily available there is far more focused and enlightening than can be easily found in print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Johnson</title>
		<link>http://edgingahead.edublogs.org/2009/04/18/course-reflection-living-out-the-soapbox-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edgingahead.edublogs.org/?p=113#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob,

Thanks for the heads up on Born Digital. Sounds like a must read. I&#039;ve been working on Tapscott&#039;s Grown Up Digital and can recommend it as well.

I would only take you to task for uniformly condoning a format - the book. Might I suggest that were we to look at print publishing as a whole - commercial presses, government presses, vanity presses, etc. - one might find materials as inaccurate, biased and dated as anything one can find on the Internet. (I think this is why they teach selection classes in library school.) I worry about reverse format bigotry as well!

Man, I wish I could read at the speed you do! I am impressed the amount and quality of your list. I go on vacation, it&#039;s usually a mental vacation as well - cheap thrillers and historical fiction!

Looking forward to meeting you in person in a few weeks. 

All the best,

Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob,</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads up on Born Digital. Sounds like a must read. I&#8217;ve been working on Tapscott&#8217;s Grown Up Digital and can recommend it as well.</p>
<p>I would only take you to task for uniformly condoning a format &#8211; the book. Might I suggest that were we to look at print publishing as a whole &#8211; commercial presses, government presses, vanity presses, etc. &#8211; one might find materials as inaccurate, biased and dated as anything one can find on the Internet. (I think this is why they teach selection classes in library school.) I worry about reverse format bigotry as well!</p>
<p>Man, I wish I could read at the speed you do! I am impressed the amount and quality of your list. I go on vacation, it&#8217;s usually a mental vacation as well &#8211; cheap thrillers and historical fiction!</p>
<p>Looking forward to meeting you in person in a few weeks. </p>
<p>All the best,</p>
<p>Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
