Edging Ahead…

 How has the explosion of web-based video changed the teaching and learning landscape?

In a nutshell, the explosion of web-based video is literally ejecting the teaching and learning landscape into a whole new trajectory: and it’s like an unstoppable, solid-rocket boost rather than a jet’s vigorous thrust, a turboprob’s gentle urging, or a prop-engine’s noisycajoling its payload forward.

The new  teaching and learning environment, in which lessons, examples, experiments and speculative meanderings are all freely available, in equal measure, to both teacher and learner, puts education on a laissez-faire footing not seen since Socrates schooled his charges.

It may be that technology is finally able to help bridge the divide between the teacher and the learner. For the one billion lucky enough to have access to the tools that brought us web-based video who are truly interested in being learners, there is no limit to what they might achieve.

Frankly, though, at the real interface of teaching and learning, where 20th-century schooled and trained teachers still guide “digital-native” students, the story is a bit more mundane.

Examples?

United Streaming

Three years ago, we licensed United Streaming, just as is it was becoming Discovery Streaming.

The promise of Discovery Streaming was seductive. In 2007, The International Society for Technology in Education completed review of the Discovery Education unitedstreaming and determined that the program clearly supports the implementation of the ISTE National Educational Technology Standards (NETS) for Students.

Combined with the size of the video database (40,000 videos and clips), focussed content (short clips to full-length videos), and the ubiquity of access through the web, it seemed that streaming video would render DVD obsolete before it could ever becom a media standard.

Then, when some of its limitations, such as download issues regarding firewalls and bandwidth, began to become apparent just as YouTube was taking off, offering FREE content on almost any topic imaginable, the luster of a paid service like DS quickly waned.

When we declined to renew the license after two years to only a handful of almost wistful emails of concern, the handwriting was on the wall. Expensive subscription databases, whether for periodicals, fulltext reference services, or media, are an endangered species.

Enter YouTube

YouTube is the first, I suspect, of a whole new paradigm for personal expression. Where generations of scribblers once wrote for a tiny chosen readership, now everyone from aspiring academics and eclectic entrepreneurs to downy-eyed dreamers and silicone snake-oil salesmen can vomit out their beliefs, biases, and unpolished pitches to the cold Crystal Eye of the webcam. Every subject imaginable has been covered, with many points of view cleverly explored. There is truly something for everyone on the web, and now it’s available in full motion glory. For the truly committed, web-based video is the new Information El Dorado.

Model on display in the Gold Museum, Bogotá, Colombia

So what’s wrong with this Picture?

Sure, it’s distorted but more important is the signal-to-noise ratio. In an environment where so much is unpolished, unfinished, inaccurate, or deliberately misleading, how can a data-miner be sure he or she is following a true high-grade vein of information?

There is so much on YouTube truly not worth the time to access that it makes the paucity of  authoritative print material on the open web seem like the Mother Lode by comparison.

In a world where we are constantly bombarded with more conflicting information, more contradicting scientific conclusions, and much, much more raw data all the time, who has time to troll through the endless files of dross that make up the bulk of YouTube?

By the time you locate a promising file, download it so you can play it uninterrupted (for those  still in the “third-world” of information access speed) and then play to evaluate it for authority, bias, content and currency, you can often have just created something yourself of equal value.

Undeniable, however, has been streaming video’s  impact on the market for other media formats.  Three years after purchasing our first DVDs and now having “officialy” retired our VHS collection, we are already faced with the next generation media storage. We are still buying DVD’s, but at one time we owned 5,000 VHS titles, while after three years we still have only around 1,000 DVDs. Because of the need to migrate to both new media (BlueRay?) and compatible players, it is likely that HD-DVD will remain almost unused in the near future.

The reason? FREE streaming video. Aside from the the ubiquitous YouTube, free video content is available from everything from CNN and ESPN feeds to Indie developers to professional blogs. On the Environment, for example

YouTube (What’s the Worst that Can Happen? Greg Craven, Indepent teacher & author)

Democracy Now (Fracking and the Environment. Abrahm Lustgarten, ProPublica)

TED Talks (What’s Wrong with What we Eat? Mark Bittman, NYTimes Food Writer)

Of course, it’s important to not  limit oneself to one’s own personal favorites, be it the Age or Ted Talks. That way lies the same one-trick ponyism that many tech afficianados fall prey to (“Read these blogs and  you’ll never go wrong”).

The answer may be in a next-generation Google that can truly and “intelligently” sift through the mountain of visual verbiage (if a picture’s worth a thousand words, what’s a minute of 30fps video worth?). But until the new Google truly rises phoenixlike from the ashes of the best of the text-dependent search algorithm web-crawlers, web-based video will still be a poor-man’s information side-show, the domain of the “truly committed” or the “obsessed”. 

The Onion (Taco Bell’s New Green Menu takes no Ingredients from Nature) 

Hmmm…

Information Technology Acceptable Use Policy or Technology Use Agreement? What’s in a Name?

During the current SUNY Technology class, at least three groups are wrestling with ISB’s Acceptable Use Policy. Two groups are redrafting existing divisional Acceptable Use Policies to bring improved currency and relevance to documents several years old.  This project is to attempt to forge a link between the somewhat subjective wording of the AUP’s as currently in development and the very objective requirements of applying principles of “acceptable use” in a real-world environment; in this case, ISB’s Main Library.

For the purposes of this reflection, I will concentrate on the work of the HS AUP and Main LIbrary
“Technology Use Agreement” teams, since the most significant disparities between policy and behavior appear at this level. By the time they reach high school, students are better equipped to both assess their own personal actions and to rationalize this behavior.

A surprising revelation as I have considered this project is that none of the related documents (from ISB) are currently (at least prominently) available on ISB’s website or 1st-generation linked pages. A Google search for “ISB Bangkok” along with “AUP” or “Acceptable Use Policy” does not turn up a working link to a current AUP at any division level. This fact alone suggests that ISB’s core relationship to an AUP needs to be rethought. The quickest way to ISB’s existing AUP’s is through the SUNY Technology Course currently in action, where the current AUP’s are offered as attachments (scroll to the bottom).

Neither is the laptop-loan-agreement we have used for the four years since we adopted wireless laptops in our Main LIbrary available online. In my search I came across Acceptable Use Policies, Laptop Loan Agreements, and Technology Use Agreements, but none from ISB.

Once again, kudos to our very own ISB SUNY instructors Jeff Utecht and Chad Bates, for finding some of the best summarties of current thinking on AUPs, posted as resources for this course from AUP (Acceptable Use Policy) For New Web Tools by Dr. Howie DeBlasi (His keynote address from the AzTEA Conference, January 31, 2009 is worth a view)

Meanwhile, while I believe in a review of the overarching guiding principles of acceptable technology use at ISB, in our Main LIbrary, we still need a tangible, quickly reviewable but relatively comprehensive set of guidelines which we will ask student patrons to sign off on. As we review our school webpages, whatever emerges as a full-blown new AUP will  be placed at the library pages. For now, here is the proposed  “isb-technology-use-agreement-final-090509” which will likely continue to be used as the “rubber-meets-road” working document to hold students accountable for acceptable technology use in Main LIbrary.

Essential Question: “What makes the web so powerful?” The one-word answer? Quality.

I’ll get to why this it. But first – In view of the “digital reality” of (our) students today, I’ve been seriously considering retiring one of the “soapbox speeches” I sometimes trot out when talking with a class that has that particular glazed-look attitude to actually looking in a book for information on their current assignment

“HEY! Check this out!” I tell them, once I’ve got their attention by jumping up on a chair, a table, or whatever is available that can give me a bit of a vantage (I’m only 5′8″ and shrinking…) and using my traveling evangelist voice.

“There’s a new technology you should know about for this assignment It’s the most amazing device ever invented for gathering, storing and providing quick answers to just about any question you might have. It’s compact, reasonably lightweight, instantly accessible, and infinitely retrievable. The information is logically organized in a way that’s easy to follow and convenient to reproduce for your own use. Setup is a snap, and there’s no tangle of cables and plugs drive you buggy. Best of all, it doesn’t even need electricity. Just grab it and GO!

I hold up a book, usually one measuring more than the 1 cm thick that I’ve noted as the limit of most teens’ interest (”if the answers aren’t in 64 pages, I’ll just Google it…”)

“This is it,” I tell them. It’s called a BOOK. And it’s a timeless example of “QUALITY“...

***

I spent the Songkran vacation upcountry (well, it’s looks like “downcountry” on a map, but it’s distinctly UPCountry).  This trip I decided to just go Cold Turkey. I packed a briefcase, the backpack I usually haul all my laptops bits around in, and, for good measure, the conference bag picked up at Learning 2.0 – with printed BOOKS, and every day I treated myself to a couple new titles.

It’s been a while since I spent any amount of real quality time reading for pleasure, and so many of the titles I had on this trip were fiction, and there area some great reads here. Check out my thoughts on these at “Reading for the Future“. Heading into this break, I figured I also would have some time on my hands (like during the 13 1/2 hour drive down) when I wouldn’t be able to read, but I could listen, so I downloaded several new titles to my phone (I don’t have an iphone, so need to list on my O2). I recently listened to “One Second After” and decided I wanted something along that line, so I had 12 hours of ”Apocalypse 2012″ by Lawrence E. Joseph to chew over. Joseph’s take on the many and varied ways in which events seem to be converging toward an inevitable collapse of society (and the technologies that underpin it) as we have come to expect them, is, in my view, a “must-read” for anyone in education, in the tech world, or just in the business of “getting on with life”.  While a true “apocalypse” may be not be inevitable, I believe that a rethink of our expectations for the future IS – and enduring quality figures prominently in whatever that future holds.

Because both “One Second After” and “Apocalypes 2012″ are pretty dark visions of the future, and to provide a bit of timeless food for thought, I also decided on this trip to try out one of our new MP3 CD audiobooks. This gave me another 9 hours of “Zen and Now” a recently published followup to the classic “Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance”. For anyone who has ever read and mulled over Robert Pirsig’s reflections on “Quality“, n “Zen and Now”, Mark Richardson offers up his own road-trip along with unique insights into Pirsig’s philosophy, and details of the Pirsig’s personal journey that, as a rider myself (with several motorcycling incidents detailed in my own book), I found absolutlely riveting. A “must-read” (or listen. Actually, this is one of those titles that I find huge pleasure in going back to again and again to listen while the miles spool by). Don’t miss it!

Of course, I didn’t ignore the non-fiction side either. To start out, I reviewed, skimmed, or otherwise perused a collection of new titles recently arrived for our library on environment/climate topics. All of these, now available in our Main Library, are worth checking out. If you aren’t yet convinced of the gravity of the situation facing the world today, or if you’re convinced, but uncertain of how you, as a single individual, can be “part of the solution rather than part of the problem”, check these out;

• Climate Chaos. Your Health at Risk. Cindy L. Parker & Stephen Shapiro. Praeger, 2008
Energy Supply and Renewable Resources. Regina Anne Kelly. Checkmark Books, 2008
• Going Global. Key Quest for the 21s Century. Michael Moynagh & Richard Worsley. A&C Black, 2008.
• Harnessing the Sun’s Energy. Why Science Matters. Heinemann, 2009.
• Plan C. Community Survival Strategies for Peak Oil and Climate Change. Pat Murphy. New Society Publishers, 2008
• Seven Years to Save the Planet. Questions and Answers.  Bill McGuire. Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 2008

Better yet, I brought with me the print copy of “Born Digital. Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives“, by John Palfrey and Urs Gasser (Basic Books, 2008).

I picked it up and glanced at the introduction, intending to skim it and summarize what I figured I already had a pretty good handle on. But then I found myself actually reading it fully, nodding at the examples that struck a chord, reflecting on the discussions we’ve already had on topics covered, and turning over in my head the things we haven’t discussed yet. I found myself going back to chapters that seemed particularly relevant and mulling over the salient points. The chapter on Quality was particularly of interest in view of my concurrent listening to “Zen and Now” and thinking back to Robert Pirsig’s theses on quality from 40 years ago. I even bookmarked several of the key points, and the book is beginning to develop a thumbed-through look even though I’m the first reader. If you’re one of the shrinking number of people who still love to read real books, get the book and spend some quality time with it.  For starters, chew on this (I’ve blogged about this on several occasions)

• p. 14 par.3 ”One of the most worrying things about all digital culture is the huge divide it’s opening up between the havs and have nots.”, and
• p. 14 par.4 “The vast majority of young people born in the world today are not growing up as Digital Natives.”

And don’t stint on Chapter 7. In the digital age, these points are more relevant than ever.  

• p. 161 – “Information quality goes directly to the heart of what it means to have a freer society. Unfortunately not all Digital Natives see it this way… In conversations with Digital Natives about information quality, questions like “So what?” and “Who Cares” are common refrains.”
• p. 163 – “It’s essential that all of us be able to differentiate good information from bad. By virtue of their age and education level Digital Natives are more susceptible  than adults to the threats posed by inaccurate information.”
• p. 165 – “When speaking about information quality, we always need to ask: “Quality” viewed from what perspective and in what context?”
• p. 166 – “…young people who access the Web, for instance, through computers in the library need to get the information very quickly and thus don’t have the time to evaluate their sources carefully.”
• p. 167 – “The ability to make quality judgements about information on the internet is not an innate skill.”

There’s more, much more. Get the hard copy and do yourself a favor. Spend some Quality time with “Born Digital” and in particular, with Chapter 7.

Back to the shop, to reality, tomorrow. I’ll be continuing to think, though, about quality – and I’m thinking that Robert Pirsig, Mark Richardson, and others, who worked, and still exist, almost exclusively in the world of print, may really have the answers (and the questions) that those “Born Digital” may never experience.

Perhaps, in the end, I consider myself lucky to be a “Digital Settler” (”Born Digital, p. 3). I like this designation better than the more commonly used “Digital Immigrant”. I’ve been there from the beginning. I worked on my first Commodore Vic20 program  (4 K of memory delivered straight to a tv monitor) for a travelling set of the new devices in Abbotsford School District in BC, Canada, in 1980. I have a collection of personal computers including one of those Vic20s, a Commodore PET, a Radio Shack TRS80, and each of the Macintosh models from the original Mac128 to the last of the all-in-one models (the Color Classic, in 1995). I appreciate quality – and I’ll keep striving for it as I move into the future – whatever it holds.

Essential Question of the Week: Do we as a global society need to rethink copyright laws? What’s our role as educators in copyright usage in schools?

I’m a strong proponent of modernizing copyright laws to reflect changes in both technology AND in society, As part of this course, I added a Creative Commons Atttibution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License to this blog. I’m on track to become a truly 21st century “cyber-citizen”.

I still worry, however, about simply bowing to the inevitable: the inevitable, in this case, is the perhaps inescapable conclusion that technology is making digital “mashups” of content from a growing number of technically accessible sources the norm in the “cyber” world.

Should we just assign a Creative Commons license to everything out there and be done with it? Encourage our students to troll the web, grab a selection of keyword-linked bits, paste them up in an approximation of original thought (providing  web-link attribution where it’s obviously not our own material) and throw in a few pithy aphorisms to give the piece the illusion of depth? It’s the way of the future, it seems.

But then a piece; a well-researched, documented and carefully crafted written piece, comes across my desk that forces me to re-think my complacency at accepting yet another small chipping away of traditional standards of scholarly research and creative expression. Make no mistake; I believe that the current penchant for posting every whimsy and personal conceit to the cyber-world at large is morphing the global pool of informative thought and creative expression into a quagmire of personal opinion superfluity.

The piece that got me thinking along this line was was an article in the March 20, 2009 issue of the Chronicle of Higher Education. forwarded to me by Dr. Jeff Harper, a thoughtful and broadly-read HS Counselor at our school, the article reminds me to consider the possible logical conclusions if we continue down the path which has brought us;

The Globalization of Cheating

Image reproduced from “Cheating Goes Global as Essay Mills Multiply” The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 20, 2009

Do we, as a global society, need to rethink copyright laws?” Of course. With the exponential growth of data and knowledge, we need to find new ways of exploiting and sharing original thought, recombining disparate ideas, and creating original new theses to explain our world. These kinds of creative endeavors should not be hamstrung by archaic systems of citation or attribution.

What’s our role as educators in copyright usage in schools?

• To move past the “letter of the law” approach focusing on a minimalist “what we can get away with” attitude,  or “the world’s your oyster” approach promoting the tired rehashing of an ever-decreasing pool of original thought.
• To re-introduce a regard for intellectual property that seems to be slipping away, emphasizing, from our efforts at introducing students to scholarly research, the ethical consideration of using other people’s work in the service of our own.
• To consider the “logical conclusion” of promoting uncritical, smorgasbord-based information selection and regurgitation instead of meaningful data harvesting and thoughtful digestion leading to the synthesis of real new ideas.

I don’t believe that it’s possible to overstate the seriousness of this situation. We ignore the “globalization of cheating” at our, and our future decision-makers’, peril; perhaps at the peril of the very societies that have brought about this Information “Garden of Eden”.

How can I make such a broad, sweeping statement? I base this on Jared Diamond’s fifth core reason for societal collapse, which is “the political cultural, and social factors in a society which make it more or less likely that a society will succeed…”

I believe that our inability to retain certain core societal values truly does threaten our very future. Who will generate new Eureka experiences if we teach the next generation to just “borrow” without building on original ideas?  Will the breadth and depth of “scholarly” thought wither from the inevitable decline of original thought when everyone is continually rehashing the thoughts of a few renegade thinkers? Will our society truly Fail, as proposed by Jared Diamond, because, among other things, we do not address root social problems that threaten to destablilize that society – like the “globalization of cheating”.

All of Diamond’s arguments are compelling – and truly frightening for the future. Worth 18 minutes of your time if you haven’t read the book…

TED Talk “Why Societies Collapse”  http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/jared_diamond_on_why_societies_collapse.html

‘,width:’100′,height:’100′” width=”100″ height=”100″ align=”" />

object>